| Previous Part of This Section | Top of This Section | Next Section
Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas

This is the largest U.S. facility for recycling plutonium from obsolete nuclear weapons; the DOD reports that the Pantex facility, as well as nuclear weapons in the field, have an inventory of 66 metric tons of 239Pu, but does not otherwise differentiate between the exact amount of plutonium at Pantex and the amount of plutonium in nuclear weapons at U.S. military bases throughout the world.

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (November 25, 1997). Review of the safety of storing plutonium pits at the Pantex Plant. DNFSB, Washington, D.C.

Mullican, W., Fryar, A. and Johns, N. (1993). Milestone report: the aerial extent and hydraulic continuity of perched ground water in the vicinity of the Pantex Plant. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
 
Rocky Flats, Colorado 

The Rocky Flats Environmental Technology site was built in 1951; it's primary commission was to build nuclear weapons components. Additional plant missions included plutonium recovering and reprocessing and waste management. Production activities included metal fabrication and assembly and chemical recovery and purification of transuranic radionuclides. As a result of weapons production activities, large quantities of 239Pu were released to the environment not only from normal operating activities (stack releases), but also from chronic releases from leaking drums of contaminated cutting oil (1958-1968), as well as from a series of fires that occurred at the plant during the late 1960's. Additional significant quantities of plutonium have accumulated within a variety of buildings in air ducts (+500 kg 239Pu) and other locations which were formerly used to fabricate nuclear weapons. The DOE BEMR lists the current inventory of plutonium at 12.9 metric tons in nearly 15,000 items, and 6.7 metric tons of highly enriched uranium in nuclear weapons parts, materials, processed residues and wastes. "Much of this material has been stored in temporary packaging since 1989 when production operations involving radioactive materials were suspended. Approximately 30,000 liters of plutonium solutions and 2,700 liters of highly enriched uranium acid solution are stored in tanks that were not designed for long term storage." (BEMR, Vol. 2, pg. Colorado 21). Total life cycle remediation costs are estimated at $17,319,000,000 in the BEMR. RADNET considers this estimate extremely liberal (i.e. low). Due to the location of this facility adjacent to a rapidly growing population area (Denver), unfavorable climatic characteristics of this site (desiccated, subject to very high wind; most population is downwind from the site), and because of the chronic release of plutonium to the environment during the years of operation of this facility, this site is probably the most dangerous among all the DOE weapons production facilities (accidents-in-progress). An extensive series environmental compliance reports and assessments can be accessed via RAD 13: 2-D: see Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, as well as BEMR links. The Radiation Control Division of the Colorado Dept. of Public Health and the Environment also has extensive information about this source point and may be accessed through either of these links.

An April 14, 1994, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board report Plutonium storage safety at major department of Energy facilities cited and reviewed in the General Bibliography at the beginning of this section (5) includes the following description of the situation at RFETS.

Albright, D. and Schonbeck, N. (1993). Report of the incident investigation subcommittee -- Incident: 1957 fire in Building 771. Submitted to the State of Colorado, 26 May 1993.

Arthur, W.J. and Alldredge, A.W. (1982). Importance of plutonium contamination on vegetation surfaces at Rocky flats, Colorado. Environ. Exp. Bot. 22. 33-38.

Boyns, P.K. and Stuart, T.P. (September 1, 1982). An aerial radiological survey of the United States Department of Energy's Rocky Flats plant date of survey: August 1981. Doc. No. EGG11831771. Accession No. NV0039776. Never classified. Opennet entry date: 08/26/1994. EG&G - Las Vegas Area Operations. pp. 27.

Cobb, J.C., et. al. (1982). Plutonium burdens in people living around the Rocky Flats Plant. EPA-600/4-82-069. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Colorado Committee for Environmental Information Subcommittee on Rocky Flats. (1970). Report on the Dow Rocky Flats fire: Implications of plutonium releases to the public health and safety. Colorado Committee for Environmental Information Subcommittee on Rocky Flats, Boulder, CO.
 
August 1969 Rocky Flats, CO Offsite soil 239Pu 13,500 d.p.m./kg (225 Bq/kg)

Coyle, D. et. al. (1988). Deadly defense: military radioactive landfills. Radioactive Waste Campaign, New York, N.Y.

Crump, K.S., Ng, T-H. and Cuddihy, R.G. (1987). Cancer incidence patterns in the Denver metropolitan area in relation to the Rocky Flats plant. American J. of Epidemiology. 126(1). pg. 127-135.

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (April 28, 1994). Trip report on ventilation/filtration systems in Buildings 559 and 707 at the Rocky Flats Plant. Memorandum for G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director.

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (October 5, 1994). Rocky Flats - Condition of facilities for plutonium residue processing. Memorandum for G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (December 29, 1994). Trip report - Trenching at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site. Memorandum for G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (May 25, 1995). Trip report - Workshop on combustible residues and meeting on residue drum safety, April 19-20, 1995. Memorandum for G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (July 10, 1995). Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) - Buildings 776/777 and 771 structural integrity concerns. Memorandum for G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (December 16, 1996). Review of Deactivation and Decommissioning Plans for Buildings 771 and 779 at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, September 17-19, 1996. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (July 15, 1996). Safety and Authorization Basis Review at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, May 23, 1996. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (December 8, 1995). Nuclear and Criticality Safety at Rocky Flats, Trip Report (November 28 - December 1, 1994). Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (December 8, 1995). Rocky Flats Solution Tanks Safety Review - Trip Report (May 23-25, 1995). Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (August 14, 1995). Rocky Flats - Status of Plutonium Residue Processing, May 22, 1995. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (July 21, 1995). Building 371 and 776 Ventilation at Rocky Flats. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (July 5, 1995). Trip Report to Rocky Flats, January 3-6, 1995 - Review of Criticality Safety and Building 707 Thermal Stabilization Preparations. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (July 5, 1995). Radiolytic Hydrogen Generation in Rocky Flats Plutonium-Nitric Acid Solution Tanks, November 28-December 1, 1994. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (May 15, 1995). Radioactive Waste Management Review at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, January 9-12, 1995. Recommendation to G.W. Cunningham, Technical Director. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (September 26, 1994). Rocky Flats Plutonium Storage. Recommendation 94-3 to the Secretary of Energy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2286a(5) Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (June 4, 1990). Criticality Safety at the Rocky Flats Plant. Recommendation 90-6 to the Secretary of Energy pursuant to Section 312(5) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Dow et. al. (1971 to date). Dow Chemical, Rockwell International, and EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc., annual environmental monitoring reports for the Rocky Flats Plant (various titles), produced annually since 1971 by EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc. and its predecessors.

Hardy, E. and Krey, (1995). P. Comments on "Spatial analysis of plutonium-239+240 and americium-241 in soils around Rocky Flats, Colorado," by M.I. Litaor. J. Environ. Qual. 24:506-516. J. Environ. Qual. 24(6), 1229.

Hardy, E.P., Volchok, H.L., Livingston, H.D. and Burke, J.C. (1980). Time pattern of off-site plutonium deposition from Rocky Flats Plant by lake sediment analyses. Environment International, 4, 21-30. Ibrahim, S.A., Webb, S.B. and Whicker, F.W. (1997). Contributions of Rocky Flats releases to the total plutonium in regional soils. Health Physics. 72(1). pg. 42-48. Illsley, C.T. (January 28, 1983). Environmental inventory-updated information on burial sites at Rocky Flats. Internal Doc. EA-321-83-240. Rockwell Int., Golden, CO.

Johnson, C.J. (1988). Rocky Flats: Death Inc. New York Times, Dec. 18, 1988.

Jones, R.H., and Zhang, Y. (1996). Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Rocky Flats Soil Plutonium Data. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Radiation Control Division, Denver, CO. Krey, P.W. and Hardy, E.P. (August 1970). Plutonium in soil around the Rocky Flats Plant. Report of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Report No. HASL-235. Health and Safety Laboratory: New York, New York.
 
Feb 14, 1970 Rocky Flats, CO On site soil 239Pu 171,000 d.p.m./kg dry soil (2,850 Bq/kg)
Krey, P. W. (1976). Remote plutonium contamination and total inventories from Rocky Flats. Health Phys. 30, 209-214.

Krey, P.W., Hardy, E.P. and Toonkey, L.E. (1976). The distribution of plutonium and americium with depth in soil at Rocky Flats. USERDA Environmental Quarterly Report. HASL-318. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, Health and Safety Lab. New York.

Krey, P.W., et. al. (1976). Plutonium and Americium contamination in Rocky Flats soils - 1973. HASL-304. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, New York.

Litaor, M. I., Thompson, M.L., Barth, G.R. and Molzer, P.C. (1994). Plutonium-239+240 and Americium-241 in soils east of Rocky Flats, Colorado. J. Environ. Qual. 23(6), 1231-1239.

Litaor, M.I., et al. (1995). Comprehensive appraisal of 239+240Pu in soils around Rocky Flats, Colorado. Health Physics, 69, 6, 923-935. Litaor, M. I. (1995). Reply to comments on "Spatial analysis of plutonium-239+240 and americium-241 in soils around Rocky Flats, Colorado," by M. I. Litaor. J. Environ. Qual. 24:506-516. J. Environ. Qual. 24(6), 1229-1231.

Litaor, M. I. (1995). Spatial analysis of plutonium-239+240 and americium-241 in soils around Rocky Flats, Colorado. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 506-516.

Litaor, M.I. (1995). Uranium isotopes distribution in soils at the Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 1-5. Litaor, M.I., Ellerbroek, D., Allen, L., and Dovala, E. (1995). A comprehensive appraisal of plutonium-239+240 in soils of Colorado. Health Phys. 69. 923-935.

Litaor, M.I., Barth, G.R. and Zika, E.M. (July-August, 1996). Fate and transport of Plutonium-239+240 and Americium-241 in the soil of Rocky Flats, Colorado. J. Environ. Qual. 25.

Litaor, M.I. and Allen, L. (September, 1996). A comprehensive appraisal of 241Am in soils around Rocky Flats, Colorado. Health Physics. 71(3). 347-357. Litaor, M.I. and Ibrahim, S.A. (September-October, 1996). Plutonium association with selected solid phases in soils of Rocky Flats, Colorado, using sequential extraction technique. J. Environ. Qual. 25. Liator, M.I., Barth, G., Zika, E.M., Litus, G., Moffitt, J. and Daniels, H. (1998). The behavior of radionuclides in the soils of Rocky Flats, Colorado. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 38(1). pg. 17-46. Little, C. A. and Whicker, F. W. (1978). Plutonium distribution in Rocky Flats soil. Health Phys. 34, 451-457.

Little, C. A., Whicker, F. W. and Winsor, T.F. (1980). Plutonium in a grassland ecosystem at Rocky Flats. J. Environ. Qual. 9, 350-354.

Love, J. (1994). Rocky Flats soil plutonium survey from 1970 to 1991, technical status report. Colorado Department of Health.

Poet, S.E. and Martell, E.A. (1972). Plutonium-239 and americium-241 contamination in the Denver area. Health Physics, 23, 537-548.

Rocky Flats Plant. (1992). Rocky Flats Plant Site environmental report. RF-ENV-92. Rocky Flats Plant, Golden, CO.

Seed, J.R., Calkins, K. W., Illsley, C.T., Miner, F.J. and Owen, J.B. (1971). Committee evaluation of Pu levels in soils within the surrounding USAEC Installation at Rocky Flats, Colorado. DOW Chemical Company, RF-INV-1. DOW Chemical Co., Golden, CO.

Terry, R. (1991). Contamination of surface soil in Colorado by plutonium, 1970-1989: summary and comparison of plutonium concentration in soil in the Rocky Flats plant vicinity and eastern Colorado. April 22, 1991, at Annual Technical Meeting, Central Rocky Mountain Chapter/Health Physics Society.

Thomas, R.S. and Ibrahim, S.A. (1995). Plutonium concentrations in lichens of Rocky Flats environs. Health Physics. 68:3, 311-319.
 
1993 Rocky Flats Soil 239,240Pu 35,600 Bq/kg
1993 Rocky Flats Lichen median (same plot) 239,240Pu 1,073 Bq/kg

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1974). Radiation Data and Reports, 15, 9, 549-624.
 
June 1972 Rocky Flats Air Concentration 239Pu 6,610.00 aCi/m3
June 1972 Miami, FL Air Concentration 239Pu 6.61 aCi/m3
Webb, S. B., Stone, J.M., Ibrahim, S.A. and Whicker, F.W. (1994). The spatial distribution of plutonium in soil near the Rocky Flats Plant. Colorado State University, Department of Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO.

Western Technologies. (1991). Plutonium-238 and 239/240 testing of the surface soil on the Conda, Spicer, and MaKay gravel lease properties, Rocky Flats west buffer zone. Project 769-OK-007, Western Aggregates Inc., Boulder, CO.
 
Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico

An important research and development laboratory located on 2,828 acres 6.5 miles east of Albuquerque, NM, total BEMR life cycle facility stabilization, environmental restoration and waste management costs are estimated at $1,591,074,000.

"The principal contamination sources include firings conducted over many years to test weapons and weapons components; discharges of radioactive liquids and hazardous chemicals; oil spills; disposal of radioactive waste and hazardous chemicals in landfills; rocket launches; and burning of certain wastes, such as high explosives. The wide range of contaminated facilities includes reactors, artillery ranges, and scrap yards." (BEMR pg. New Mexico - 52).

Sandia is the location of 2,331 kg of spent nuclear fuel, and a possible site for some undocumented historical disposal of missing military radioactive wastes. Sandia is of most interest, however as a principal component of DOE efforts to monitor and dispose of existing radioactive wastes. Sandia is the principle laboratory involved with the design and construction of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal of weapons production derived transuranic wastes, as well as the location of the Cooperative Monitoring Center (CMC), which uses sophisticated remote sensing technologies as a component of nuclear non-proliferation research and investigation. See especially Sandia derived information pertaining to the Airborne Multisensor Pod System (AMPS). Also see RAD 4: Definitions and conversion factors for more information pertaining to AMPS. See RAD 13: RADLINKS: Part II-D, Sandia National Laboratory.
 
Savannah River Plant, S. Carolina 

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Integrated DataBase reports the Savannah River Site (SRS) inventory of high-level waste as of Jan. 1, 1996 at 502,200,000 Ci (See Oak Ridge citation under the subsection, U. S. Nuclear Power Plants; also see additional comments on missing U.S. military (DOE) high-level wastes in part 14 of this section). The DOE Baseline Environmental Management Report (BEMR) lists total life cycle remediation costs at $48,769,000,000, another example of DOE's liberal (i.e. low) estimates for one of the most contaminated weapons production sites in the world. Not enough data is available to determine whether the Savannah River site or the Hanford Reservation in Washington is the second largest nuclear accident-in-progress within the continental United States; the Rocky Flats site being the most dangerous in terms of the immediate potential health physics impact.

The Savannah River Site covers 310 sq. miles in west central South Carolina and is separated from Georgia only by the Savannah River on its south west side. The DOE BEMR includes an extensive description of the facilities in this location including area maps.

The Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) maintains an Internet Site (see RAD 13: RADLINKS: Part II D-2: DOE Laboratory Servers).

Alberts, J.J., Halverson, J.E. and Orlandini, K.A. (1986). The distribution of plutonium, americium and curium isotopes in pond and stream sediments of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina, USA. J. Environ. Radioactivity, 3, 249-271.
 
August 1979 Savannah River site Pond sediments 239,240Pu 1410 pCi/kg
December 1981 Savannah River site Pond sediments 241Am 4,360 pCi/kg
December 1981 Savannah River site Pond sediments 244Cm 392 pCi/kg
Alvarez, R. and Makhijani, A. (Aug./Sept., 1988). Hidden legacy of the arms race: Radioactive waste. Technology Review. 42-51. Carlton, W.H., Murphy, C.E. and Evans, A.G. (1994). Radiocesium in the Savannah River site environment. Health Physics, 67, 3, 233-244.
 
1955-89 Savannah R. site Atmospheric release 137Cs 3.5 Ci (130 GBq)
1955-89 Savannah R. site Liquid release 137Cs 600 Ci (22,000 GBq)
Centers for Disease Control. (February 1999). Savannah River Site (SRS) dose reconstruction. Radiation Studies Branch, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA.  http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/programs/radiation/srs/ Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. (August 14, 1996). In-tank precipitation system at the Savannah River Site. Recommendation 96-1 to the Secretary of Energy. Fendley, T.T., Manlove, M.N. and Brisbin, I.L. (1977). The accumulation and elimination of radiocesium by naturally contaminated Wood Ducks. Health Physics. 32, 415-422. Hayes, D.W. (1980). Tritium in the Savannah River estuary and adjacent marine waters. Report No. IAEA-SM-232/80. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. McLendon, H.R. Soil monitoring for plutonium at the Savannah River Plant. Health Physics, 28. 347-354.
 
1973 Savannah River site Soil 239Pu 535 mCi/km2
Mohler, H.J., Whicker, F. W. and Hinton, T.G. (1997). Temporal trends of 137Cs in an abandoned reactor cooling reservoir. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 37(3). pg. 251-268. Newman, M.C. and Brisbin, I.L. (1990). Variation of 137Cs levels between sexes, body sizes and collection localities of mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki (Girard 1859), inhabiting a reactor cooling reservoir. J. Environ. Radioactivity. 12:2. 131-142.
 
April 1987 Savannah R. cooling reservoir Whole body concentration 137Cs 5.02 Bq/g
Pinder, J.E., Alberts, J.J., Bowling, J.W., Nelson, D.M. and Orlandini, K.A. (1992). The annual cycle of plutonium in the water column of a warm, monomictic reservoir. J. Environ. Radioactivity. 17:1. 59-82.


Straney, D.O., Beaman, B., Brisbin, I.L. and Smith, M.H. (1975). Radiocesium in birds of the Savannah River Plant. Health Physics.28. 341-345.
 
Summer 1971+1972 SRP, Aiken SC Kingbird (summer bird) Total body burden 2,992,700 pCi/kg live weight

U.S. Congress. (1989). Nuclear reactor safety at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Plant. Joint Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs United States Senate, Sept. 30, 1988. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
West Valley, New York 

West Valley is the location of a facility constructed for the purpose of reprocessing commercial spent fuel. The operation of this facility resulted in a debacle of major proportions as well as in the termination of attempts to reprocess spent fuel in the United States. West Valley is one of the oldest, best known and most thoroughly studied plume source points in the United States. Articles or research papers discussing or documenting this plume source point run into the hundreds if not the thousands over a period of the last three decades. For a concise summary of this facility see the DOE BEMR, New York. West Valley is currently in the final stages of a 17 year effort by the DOE to solidify by glassification 600,000 gallons of radioactive waste left over from reprocessing efforts. Cost estimates for this vitrification program are 1.4 billion dollars for of 280 ten feet tall by 2 feet in diameter 2.5 ton waste casks which will be stored on-site indefinitely (until a permanent storage facility is identified and prepared.)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Integrated Data Base reports the former fuel reprocessing facility at West Valley, NY inventory of high-level waste as of Jan. 1, 1996 at 24,700,000 Ci. Extensive surveys of the West Valley area have been conducted by the New York State Department of Conservation, one of whose reports is cited in Section 8 of RADNET.

U. S. Department of Energy. (1996). Plutonium recovery from spent fuel reprocessing by nuclear fuel services at West Valley, New York from 1966 to 1972. U. S. DOE, Washington, D.C.


| Next Part of This Section | Top of This Section | Next Section |

| Index | Introduction | Guide | Accidents | Definitions | Radionuclides | Protection Guidelines | Plumes | Baseline Data | Dietary Intake | Chernobyl | Source Points | Maine Yankee | Links | Bibliography | Alerts | Sponsor |